HSK 5 · Sentence components › Complement › State complements 2
HSK 5 State Complements with Fixed Phrases: 动词/形容词 + 得 + 固定短语
At HSK 5, state complements expand beyond simple adjectives to use fixed four-character phrases and idioms after 得. This lesson explains how to link verbs and adjectives directly to fixed phrases to describe the vivid state or visible outcome resulting from an action or quality.

她把办公室整理得井井有条。
Uses a transitive verb (整理) with the object moved ahead via 把, allowing 得 to attach directly to the verb before the fixed phrase 井井有条.
× 李经理讲故事得津津有味。
Incorrect because the object 故事 is placed between the verb 讲 and the particle 得. Replace with the verb-copying structure in “李经理讲故事讲得津津有味。”.
Corrected example: 李经理讲故事讲得津津有味。
Read the full explanation and examples
What Is a Fixed-Phrase State Complement?
In the HSK 5 grammar syllabus, the item 状态补语2 (State Complement 2) includes the pattern 动词/形容词 + 得 + 固定短语 (Verb/Adjective + 得 + Fixed Phrase). In a Chinese sentence, a state complement sits in the predicate after the main verb or adjective and is introduced by the structural particle 得 (pronounced in the neutral tone, de). Instead of simply grading an action as fast or slow, this pattern uses an idiomatic fixed expression (固定短语), typically a four-character set phrase or 成语, to paint a vivid picture of the resulting state, condition, or atmosphere.
Grammatically, the verb or adjective before 得 states the core action or quality, while the fixed phrase after 得 carries the descriptive weight of the sentence. Because fixed phrases are compact and expressive, native speakers rely on this structure in both spoken narrative and formal writing when a single basic adjective feels too plain.
Using Verbs vs. Adjectives Before 得
The syllabus explicitly groups verbs (动词) and adjectives (形容词) in this structure because their syntax after the head word is identical: both attach directly to 得 followed by the fixed phrase. However, the relationship between the head word and the complement differs slightly depending on which word class you use.
When the head word is a verb, the fixed phrase describes the observable state of the subject or the object caused by performing that action. For instance, after the verb 整理 (to tidy up) or 跑 (to run), the fixed phrase shows the neat arrangement of the room or the physical appearance of the runners.
她把办公室整理得井井有条。
Uses a transitive verb (整理) with the object moved ahead via 把, allowing 得 to attach directly to the verb before the fixed phrase 井井有条.
孩子们在操场上跑得满头大汗。
Uses an intransitive action verb (跑) + 得 + fixed phrase (满头大汗) to describe the visible physical state resulting from the action.
When the head word is an adjective, the fixed phrase illustrates the concrete manifestation or extreme state of that quality. Rather than just saying a department is very busy (很忙) or a hallway is very quiet (很安静), the fixed phrase specifies what that busyness or quietness actually looks or sounds like.
年底到了,财务部忙得不可开交。
Uses an adjective (忙) + 得 + fixed phrase (不可开交) to depict the state of extreme busyness.
深夜的走廊安静得鸦雀无声。
Uses an adjective (安静) + 得 + fixed phrase (鸦雀无声) to portray the concrete scene of silence.
Word Order and Position Restrictions
The most important syntactic rule for all 得 complements is adjacency: the particle 得 must immediately follow the verb or adjective root. Nothing is allowed to stand between the verb/adjective and 得.
- No objects before 得: If a transitive verb or a verb-object compound (such as 讲故事 or 整理房间) takes a state complement, the object cannot stay between the verb and 得. You must either repeat the verb, move the object before the verb (often as a topic or using 把), or omit the object if the context is clear.
- No aspect particles before 得: Particles like 了, 过, and 着 can never be placed right before 得.
- Use the plain adjective in the basic examples, such as 忙得不可开交. A general degree adverb is unnecessary there. Check the complete construction and intended meaning instead of assuming that every 得 complement expresses an extreme degree or imposes identical restrictions on all modifiers.
× 李经理讲故事得津津有味。
Incorrect because the object 故事 is placed between the verb 讲 and the particle 得. Replace with the verb-copying structure in “李经理讲故事讲得津津有味。”.
Corrected example: 李经理讲故事讲得津津有味。
李经理讲故事讲得津津有味。
Correct replacement for “李经理讲故事得津津有味。”: the verb 讲 is repeated after the object 故事 so that 得 immediately follows the verb.
Distinguishing Neighbouring Complements
Because HSK 5 introduces several complement structures side by side, it helps to separate 动词/形容词 + 得 + 固定短语 from neighbouring patterns by looking at what follows 得 and how it functions.
- “Fixed phrase” describes a conventional expression, while “verb phrase” and “subject–predicate phrase” describe internal grammar; these classifications can overlap. A productive verb phrase such as 流出了眼泪 in 笑得流出了眼泪 contrasts with a conventional unit such as 井井有条. Do not use 合不拢嘴 as proof that an expression is not fixed: it is itself a familiar set expression.
- Degree expressions such as 不得了 mainly intensify, while descriptive fixed phrases can specify a manner or scene. For example, 鸦雀无声 conveys complete silence as an idiom; it does not require actual birds to be present. Not every fixed phrase paints a literal visual scene.
- Choose a fixed phrase that fits the predicate: 整理得井井有条 describes orderly organization, while 跑得满头大汗 depicts a runner sweating. General degree expressions also have their own selection restrictions; neither group can be attached mechanically to any adjective.
Frequently asked questions
Does 固定短语 only mean classical four-character idioms (成语)?
Most fixed phrases used in this slot are four-character expressions—including classical 成语 like 鸦雀无声 and common four-character set phrases like 满头大汗 or 乱七八糟. The key feature is that the expression is a fixed, prefabricated unit rather than a freely assembled clause.
Can I add 很 before the adjective when using 得 + 固定短语?
For the basic sentence 财务部忙得不可开交, leave out 很: the complement supplies the intended intensified description. This recommendation concerns that construction; it is not a general proof that every 得 complement is already extreme or that every modifier is impossible.
Can this pattern occur in negative or future statements?
Yes. The frame describes a state without by itself fixing time or truth. 把办公室整理得井井有条 can be a future instruction. 他并没有忙得不可开交 denies that the extreme state was reached. Negation must have the intended scope; inserting 不 mechanically inside a fixed idiom may change or spoil that idiom.